If you were watching CPAC in the last week, the proposed Free Trade Agreement between Canada and Columbia is not popular with all elected politicians. In fact, one MP said that Columbians have said now is not the time for an agreement, but to return again another time. Same MP mentioned how NAFTA was sold as helping jobs and citizens here but that did not quite work out.
Critics argue the deal mustn’t proceed without a comprehensive, independent review of its potential impact on human rights. Said Hoyos: If Canada, “known for respecting human rights,” goes ahead with the deal, “it will be backing the regime of human rights violators.”
The Uribe government portrays Colombia as a “post-conflict” country (in terms of widespread civil war with leftist guerrillas), apart from the aforementioned war on drugs and terrorism. The death squads no longer exist, goes the mantra.
Kathy Price, Colombia specialist for Amnesty International Canada, says her organization is concerned over “a whitewash of the facts in Colombia ... where death squads continue to operate with impunity.”
Adds Price: “Let no one be under any false impression things are resolved in Colombia.”
A recent Amnesty International study says more than 60 percent of people forced from their homes and land come from areas of mineral, agricultural and other economic importance. “The fighting has provided a useful cover for those seeking to expand and protect economic interests,” says the report. “The civilian population continues to bear the brunt of the violence.”
http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/article/789443--is-colombia-free-enough-for-free-trade-with-canada~~~~~~
Ford wants more accountability on how travel dollars are spent.
“There aren’t any rules,” he said. “You can go around the world and put it under your travel expenses, which is a separate expense outside your regular budget. You never have to give any explanation, never have to give a report back to council and you can turn a one-day conference into a 14-day holiday.”
Candidate George Smitherman agreed with Ford, saying council’s spending habits on travel are “as if the money was burning a hole in their pockets.”
http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2010/04/02/13450841.htmlFormer Ontario Health Minister Smitherman, now in the running for Toronto's mayoral chair, shows himself as defending the taxpayers, but nothing seemed to apply to him when he was at the Ministry of Health and the cost overruns for the Smart Health project, later called e-Health.
Wonder if he is experiencing a familiar feeling at the annual release of the list of public servants with $100K or more in incomes/salaries, as some people working for Health are still being pegged as university or hospital employees instead of consultants/employees for the Health Ministry.
Taxpayers duped on sunshine list, critics chargePublished On Thu Apr 1 2010
Rob Ferguson and Robert Benzie
Queen’s Park Bureau
The Liberal government is on the defensive for continuing to channel salaries for top-earning civil servants through hospitals and other institutions where they are not employed.
Despite a promise from Premier Dalton McGuinty last October that “we’re going to change it,” salaries such as the $511,971 paid to former deputy health minister Ron Sapsford were still listed through hospitals in the government’s annual four-volume “sunshine list” made public Thursday.
The list reveals the earnings of public employees making more than $100,000 annually.
As first revealed by the Star last October, the government has been hiding the salaries of some high-rolling bureaucrats to avoid public scrutiny and skirt civil service pay guidelines, such as the maximum of $220,150 recommended for deputy ministers.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/789132--taxpayers-duped-on-sunshine-list-critics-charge